
In the West we like to humanise our animals, writes Diane Southam. Cuddly little creatures with human traits and foibles pervade our children’s stories. We take our domestic pets along to beauty parlours and even psychiatrists.
Inuit Eskimos also believe in the existence of an animal-human connection. They claim that animals understand human speech and credit the bear with having a human soul. The similarity, however, ends there.
When it comes to
being hunted for sport, used in medical experiments or slaughtered in the
abattoir animals in the West are de-invested
of ‘human’ feelings such as sensitivity
to pain or awareness of death. The Inuit, on the other hand, believe that if a
dead animal is treated with disrespect it will not return to the earth to be
hunted.
For the Inuit and
many of the 300 million tribal peoples around the world, besides being a
primary source of food, animals exert a powerful spiritual presence. Animal spirits are alleged to accompany the
Shaman on his or her ecstatic flight around the cosmos. A
natural code of behaviour exists in the wild, which involves never killing more
than is needed for survival, and sharing the kill with others.
This ‘respectful’
form of hunting has nevertheless managed to upset some wildlife
conservationists because the animals killed by tribal people are sometimes
classified as endangered species. Demands that indigenous people stop hunting
can often mean an end to their entire way of life. There are many reasons why a species of wildlife becomes endangered – the
most common being the destruction or pollution of its natural habitat,
careless, unsustainable hunting and industrial fishing.
Unfortunately for
the tiger its legendary power has made it one of the most prized raw
ingredients in traditional Chinese medicine. In ancient China the stripes on a
tiger’s face were interpreted as a symbol for ‘Wang’ – meaning King, and it
remains a widespread belief that a boy born in the Year of the Tiger has the
power to ward off evil. TRAFFIC, the world wide fund for nature’s trade
monitoring arm estimated that 27 million preparations claiming to contain tiger
were recorded in trade statistics over a two year period. Demands by Western
conservationists that Chinese communities switch to other forms of medicine
have sometimes been construed as culturally arrogant and offensive to
practitioners of Chinese medicine whose co-operation is essential if public
opinion is to be swayed in favour of preserving the tiger.
Over zealous
wildlife conservationists have come in for some heavy criticism in recent years
from organisations like SURVIVAL – which was established in 1969 to protect the
rights of indigenous peoples. One of SURVIVAL’S concerns is that tribal
people often get a raw deal when national parks are set up to protect wildlife.
Denied the right to graze their herds or hunt food they can become ‘poachers’
overnight on the very land their ancestors have hunted for hundreds of
years. The Twa pygmies in Zaire now
live on handouts at the edge of Kahuzi-Biega Park – their tribal home for
generations. SURVIVAL claims that in practice, the conservation movement has
subjected tribal peoples to state or corporate control. In a newsletter it asked how long would it be
before conservationists start using slogans like ‘Pandas Not People?’
While indigenous
peoples clearly risk becoming an endangered species themselves they are also,
at times, guilty of hunting unsustainably. Killing a pregnant animal, for example, can jeopardise not only the
future of the animal species in question, but also the food supply of the
tribe.
‘Symbiosis,’ According to Daisaku Ikeda, President of SGI ‘which means living and prospering together, has become the key word of our time, whether in reference to relationships among nations or between humankind and nature.’
SGI supports the Earth Charter Initiative whose mission is:
‘to promote the transition
to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical
framework that includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological
integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice,
democracy, and a culture of peace.’
A statement
issued by the WWF (World Wildlife Foundation) of principles on Indigenous
Peoples and Conservation urged that ‘Indigenous peoples and conservation organisations should be natural
allies in the struggle to conserve both a healthy natural world and healthy
human societies.’ It advanced the view
that indigenous people make the best conservationists.
Its CAMPFIRE
PROJECT (Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources) launched
some years ago to provide a framework for managing Zimbabwe’s wildlife
resources including eland, buffalo, impala, crocodile, ostrich and elephant,
proved to be something of a success. Under the programme local councils managed the wildlife that was raised
on communally owned lands and collected the revenue from controlled hunting and
selling meat and hides. Part of this
was reinvested in the community to help fund local infrastructure and
healthcare.
As far as
SURVIVAL is concerned such initiatives to consult local people and to
acknowledge the role of indigenous peoples in managing protected areas ‘looks
good on paper’, but is hardly, they claim, an adequate substitute for land
ownership rights and self determination. Nevertheless, it’s definitely a step in the
right direction, and there are indications that in different parts of the world
creative solutions are being found
whereby wildlife is preserved without native people having to lose out.
Brazil’s five sea
turtle species were being so heavily exploited for their shells, eggs, oil and
meat that conservationists feared that some might well become extinct. Working with former turtle hunters, the
Brazilian Federal Agency of the Environment launched a turtle rescue project.
The hunters are now paid to protect nesting beaches. They search the sand for eggs, dig them up, pack them and take
them to one of the seventeen stations set up along the coast. Here the eggs are
reburied in open-air hatcheries. Once
hatched, the baby turtles are returned to the wild. The local people, the
conservationists and the turtles are happy.
In Borneo Dutch
Biologist Willie Smits's astonishing success with the re-forestation
and the restoration of the ecosystem of a former rain forest in order to
preserve the Orang-utan has involved the participation of local people has led
to the creation of three thousand jobs.
If we are to
inhabit a world of Pandas and People,
the way forward is surely through encouraging open, flexible and culturally
sensitive dialogue. Recently environmentalists and specialists in Chinese
medicine have been sitting down together to discuss the problem and solutions
are starting to emerge. Domesticated
animal bones have been suggested as a possible medicinal substitute for Tiger.
‘Life is a chain’, writes Daisaku Ikeda; ‘All things are related. When any link is harmed, the other links are affected.’Environmentalists and indigenous people need each other’s wisdom to find creative solutions to the problem of vanishing wildlife. It is, after all, in everybody’s interest.